Wednesday, November 14, 2018

The Incorrupt Body of Justinian the Great

19th century print showing soldiers of the 4th Crusade
discovering the incorrupt body of Justinian I in AD 1204.
On November 14, AD 565, the Roman Emperor Justinian passed to his eternal reward after a long and extraordinarily eventful reign of 38 years. But this post is not about Justinian's legendary works or even the circumstances surrounding his death. It is, instead, about an event that happened a full 639 years after his death.

On the fateful day of April 13, AD 1204, the knights of the Fourth Crusade, driven mad by thoughts of vengeance and visions of tremendous wealth, successfully breached the massive sea-walls of Constantinople. Once the city had fallen and most resistance had been quelled, the disgraced crusaders began a systematic search for loot of all kinds. In this effort, they did not spare even the wondrous churches of Constantinople, and one of their targets was the Church of the Holy Apostles which had served as an imperial tomb for centuries. The Byzantine historian, Nicetas Choniates, an eye-witness to the siege writing only a few years after the event, picks up the tale from here:
Exhibiting from the very outset, as they say, their innate love of gold, the plunderers of the queen city conceived a novel way to enrich themselves while escaping everyone’s notice. They broke open the sepulchers of the emperors which were located within the Heroon erected next to the great temple of the Disciples of Christ [Holy Apostles] and plundered them all in the night, taking with utter lawlessness whatever gold ornaments, or round pearls, or radiant, precious, and incorruptible gems that were still preserved within.
Here's where things get really interesting, however. When the disgraced crusaders violated the tomb of the emperor Justinian the Great, they received a severe but momentary shock. Choniates continues:
Finding the corpse of Emperor Justinian had not decomposed through the long centuries, they looked upon the spectacle as a miracle, but this in no way prevented them from keeping their hands off the tomb’s valuables. In other words, the Western nations spared neither the living nor the dead, but beginning with God and his servants, they displayed complete indifference and irreverence to all. [Taken from Magoulias: O City of Byzantium: Annals of Niketas Choniatēs
Most Catholics are familiar with incorruptibility as the remains of some of the best known saints -- from Saint Cecilia in antiquity, to Saint Bernadette in the 19th century, to Saint Pio of Pietrelcina in modern times, have displayed the phenomenon. The origins of incorruptibility are mysterious and it is normally considered a sign of extraordinary sanctity, though clearly some of the saints' bodies considered among the incorrupt have been embalmed, coated with wax, or otherwise preserved through some very non-spiritual means.

While Orthodox Christians have considered Justinian a saint for centuries, he is not considered such by Catholics. It is a shame that no Western ecclesiastic or historian saw fit to record the remarkable occurrence of his exhumation. Equally sad is that no remnant of the emperor's relics or the accouterments seem to have survived the desecration of his tomb.

It is interesting to note, however, that within a year of his death in AD 565, Justinian seems to have adopted a heretical position known as Aphthartodocetism. A semi-Monophysite heresy, Aphthartodocetism held that the body of Christ was incorruptible, impassible and that the incarnation was real only in appearance. Given the central tenet of this heresy, it is interesting to speculate on the state of Justinian's corpse when discovered by the fallen crusaders and the message, if any, worldly or divine, it was meant to send.

If there was a message there, however, the disgraced crusaders were too busy worshiping Mammon to catch it.

7 comments:

IrishEddieOHara said...

How is a man who murdered 4,500 Saxon prisoners in cold blood, and who used violence to get his way, in any way a "saint?"

Really? If this guy is a "saint" then I am a saint, sinful and wicked as I am. What a crock! Saints are supposed to live a virtuous and Christ-like life, not go about killing people and using violence to get their way.

I write this off as so much urban legend, along with the visionaries of the Roman Catholic Church who are always clammoring about the coming of the Great Tribulation.

Sheeeesh!!!

Florentius said...

When did Justinian murder 4,500 Saxon prisoners in cold blood? I am not familiar with that event. Please cite your source.

IrishEddieOHara said...

I did a little research on this and apparently I either read something in error or misunderstood what I read. It was not Justinian. It was Charlemagne. Glad you challenged me on this so I can straighten it out.

Florentius said...

Ah, that makes a lot more sense. Thanks for coming back here and updating. I was thinking that there was some aspect of Justinian's history that I had either missed or forgotten about and was prepared to be humbled! :-)

IrishEddieOHara said...

Thank you! I am writing a book and I had that comment about Justinian in it. That would have been deeply embarrassing to me to be called down by anyone who is a history scholar.

Follow up: Justinian was still a very rough "saint" as such. But perhaps I don't understand the culture in which he ran.

Florentius said...

I understand completely. The idea of having a gross historical inaccuracy or anachronism in one of my books is a constant worry. As for Justinian, he's a fascinating historical figure indeed. The Orthodox consider him a saint. Most other Christian Churches (including the Catholic Church) do not, largely because he seems to have embraced the aphthartodocetist heresy in his old age.

IrishEddieOHara said...

He is probably considered a saint because he defended the true beliefs which were under attack at that time. If half of what others have written about him regarding his personal moral behavior is true, he is not a saint in my book. Being a saint is a complete package of moral behavior, orthodox belief, and communion with God. He doesn't appear to qualify.

The Roman Church is no less guilty of making a couple of men saints who were also despicable moral human beings, such as Josephat Kunsevich, who killed Orthodox Christians the way I would kill roaches.