I have not seen the film and have no intention of seeing it. But since the marketing campaign for it has penetrated Catholic media, I recall that I had written a review of this piece of literary detritus about seven years ago when it was at the height of its ill-deserved popularity. That review may be found here in full, but the key points of my criticism were as follows.
The primary problem with The Shack is that the author takes the outrageous liberty of writing long passages in the voice of God, Jesus, the Holy Spirit, and a personification of Wisdom (the Quadrinity?). Doing so in a work of fiction is fraught with peril even when such dialogue is scrupulously aligned with Sacred Scripture and Church tradition. Needless to say, William Young, the author of The Shack, has no such scruples.
When reading The Shack, we learn:
- Our view of God as "Father" is a product of religious conditioning.
- Jesus's life was not meant to be an example to follow.
- Jesus did not come to build an institution called the Church.
- The real church is about "relationships and sharing life".
- Jesus is "not too big on religion."
- Jesus isn't a "Christian" and has no desire that others become "Christians."
- God doesn't expect us to obey the Law. In fact, "all things are lawful."
|Yeah, don't bother.|
Interestingly, the supernatural being known as "Lucifer" does not make an appearance in The Shack. The reason for that omission seems obvious. On that note, I would recommend that anyone who is tempted to read The Shack, or watch the movie, would be better served by reading The Screwtape Letters instead.